Items

• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-11-12; 61550

  Thanks C-SPAN for their coverage of election day and the debates featured prior to that day, then urges them to cover "emerging parties."
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-03-01; 46616

  Warns that the fighting between parties may be destructive
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-05-17; 48074

  Asks that more background be given about guests and people interviewed on C-SPAN.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-09-12; 08536

  Questions the divided phone lines used for call-ins on C-SPAN and feels they are unfair.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-09-12; 13669

  Thanks C-SPAN for allowing alternate parties on their shows and argues for more populism.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-03-28; 12550

  Feels that many guests "regurgitate" party lines and suggests more responsibility across all levels.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-02-03; 32256

  Describes the changes in political parties from their perspective and argues about why reporting should be objective.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-01-27; 32507

  Expresses confusion at support for the Republican party and praises Bill Clinton, then explains their impressions of the differences between the Republican and Democratic parties and suggests a television program about it.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 12801

  Praises the journalists on a Journalists' Roundtable program for being precise and non-partisan. Explains why they believe Congressmen are useless.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1994-09-14; 19460

  Says the network did not give equal time to a third party candidate running for governor in Pennsylvania. Asserts new agencies should be fair to third parties.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 98408

  Critiques the filming of a particular interview.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-08-28

  Dislikes how C-SPAN hosts cut off callers and repetitious commercials.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-08-29

  Thanks C-SPAN and discusses a Republican candidate for governor.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1995-11-03

  Praises C-SPAN but thinks the round table should be a desk to hide the guests' legs.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-08-18; 79902

  Complains about the separate phone lines and people labelling themselves "Progressives" and suggests asking these people what distinguishes them as a progressive.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-05-15

  Issues requests to bring in guests in support of third-party politics and offers opinion that dividing phone calls into three lines was a poor decision.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-04-20; 01238

  Requests that some less partisan guests be invited on Washington Journal to discuss Bill Clinton's policies.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-19; 70118

  Follows up on a proposal sent to C-SPAN suggesting more consistency in announcing the ideological affiliations of callers and asks to be consulted directly on improving this aspect.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 33703

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-18

  Expresses frustration that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 59445

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-18; 54495

  Requests to see the conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 64052

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 45440

  Questions why C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-18; 48167

  Questions why C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-19

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system and accuses them of bias.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-17

  Questions why C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-16; 15601

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-18

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system and blames media bias.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-21; 30750

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-18; 35213

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system and asks more consideration be given to covering such events.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-17; 11764

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system and asks more consideration be given to covering such events.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-17; 60103

  Expresses disappointment that C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system and asks more consideration be given to covering such events.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-21

  Asks why C-SPAN did not cover a conference on the two-party system.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-02-08; 93923

  Thanks C-SPAN for airing third party views and suggests Reform Party spokespeople as guests for C-SPAN.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-05-16; 06033

  Questions why C-SPAN was not present at a Washington, D.C. meeting on the emergence of third parties.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-11-03

  Offers positive feedback of a speech given on C-SPAN which touched on education and the movement of third parties.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1994-01-25

  Suggests featuring representatives from other political parties on program.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-08-18; 03253

  Discusses the de Tocqueville series as well as the representation of third parties on C-SPAN and other topics.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-08-21

  Discusses what they feel Alexis de Tocqueville would think of the party system in the United States currently.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1999-06-02

  Argues in favor of one phone line.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-11-11

  Laments the lack of a line for independent voters.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-12-21

  Dislikes the divided phone lines because they do not feel that they fit into any category and suggests discontinuing the division.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-12-27; 93906

  Expresses relief at seeing regional phone lines restored because they have not enjoyed the lines divided politically.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1998-03-06; 54901

  Registers their dislike for the new divided phone lines and suggests the C-SPAN Bus stop in Madison, Wisconsin.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-12-07; 19018

  Suggests the different phone lines be discontinued because they think it is divisive.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-09-29

  Discusses other topics and the division of phone lines, feeling it assumes viewers are dumb.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1997-02-24; 72205

  Offers their thoughts regarding the division of phone lines and argues for a non-political call-in scheme.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-11-20; 10023

  Expresses support for dividing the phone lines.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-12-04

  Dislikes that C-SPAN continues to divide the phone lines after the election and expresses mistrust.