Items
-
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-06; 93016
Three letters--the first is commenting on a senator speaking too much, the second letter praises a governor, the last is about requesting full-time C-SPAN access from cable companies. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-01; 73072
Says they are upset about losing access to C-SPAN because of congress' involvement in cable companies. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-08-16; 43207
Requests their cable company provide C-SPAN and CNBC separate channels. -
Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 12547
Praises the network as educational and inquires if C-SPAN has any suggestions of how to obtain C-SPAN2 with their cable company. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-08-16; 92683
Explains their cable company limits air time for C-SPAN to comply with the FCC and asks for help. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-05-27; 93921
Complains about their cable company not providing C-SPAN2 and removed C-SPAN because of the FCC regulations. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-07-09; 98034
An article they wrote about C-SPAN becoming inaccessible and impacting their ability to be an informed citizens. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-05-24; 02806
Requests general information about C-SPAN and cable system marketing material. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-04-28; 94401
Asks a cable company why C-SPAN networks are not being offered and attached is a reply from the company that discusses the FCC and the Cable Act; there are more letters--one from a member of congress, the Office of Communications, and the cable company. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-04-02; 18415
Explains they lost satellite access to C-SPAN's programs and have to resort to the incomplete congress coverage of newspapers. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-02-06; 12138
States they no longer have access to C-SPAN because of the satellite change. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-03-05; 06365
Explains how C-SPAN satellite channel shift has negatively impacted them. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-02-22; 22503
Inquires why C-SPAN decided to switch satellite channels and inconvenience satellite owners with the inaccessibility. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-01-31; 03580
States C-SPAN should not advertise itself as "serving the public" when cable is inaccessible for many and is now inaccessible for people using satellites. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-02-14; 26294
Explains how their satellite is unable to pick up C-SPAN's signal after a channel change and hope it will be changed. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-03-30; 71105
Wonders if there a "pro-gay" conspiracy within cable companies because C-SPAN was cut off during hearings about gay people in the military. Attached is a letter to the Senate Armed Services Committee about the hearings being censored. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-05-07; 08079
Praises a Russian news station and states that the station is "helpful in keeping up with the true situation in Russia." -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-03-27; 15203
Explains their cable company is removing C-SPAN 1&2 from the basic package to a more expensive package. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-03-30; 28462
Inquires about how to influence their cable company to provide C-SPAN2. Comments there must be a conspiracy in favor of repeat callers. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-04-03; 15211
Explains how their cable company moved the C-SPAN network to a more expensive package and that it is unaffordable. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-04-06; 19312
Asks how to get their cable company to provide C-SPAN2; complains about a local newspaper not discussing the budget and agrees with Perot about the public wanting "hard news." -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-05-12; 10566
Explains C-SPAN may be able to influence local cable companies to provide the BBC World Service audio channel. Attached is an article about C-SPAN's audio services. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-05-29; 12564
States C-SPAN & C-SPAN2 do an excellent job of education the public and inquires if there is a way to have their cable provider air both networks full-time. Attached is a letter to a cable network about receiving C-SPAN2. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1994-01-24; 03031
Requests information on how to receive C-SPAN2 and praises the C-SPAN staff for being professional. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1994-01-31; 10509
Recommends C-SPAN stop airing its services in D.C. and is outraged their cable company removed C-SPAN in favor of keeping soft-pornography channels. Criticizes callers for being misinformed and political parties for using the media as a scapegoat. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-12-14; 98365
Inquires if there is any information available concerning cable regulations and public service programs. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-10-27; 94043
Requests a catalogue of C-SPAN's videos for adding to the local government access channel. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-11-15; 27858
Requests C-SPAN try and add full-time C-SPAN & C-SPAN2 programming to the Greenville area. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-10-05; 94611
Explains they are dependent on C-SPAN for educational purposes and that their cable company is removing the network from the "basic" package. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-27; 94061
Fears Brian Lamb is a "closet liberal" because Rush Limbaugh has not been invited to be a guest on a panel. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-10-09
States the passing of "Must Carry" was a mistake because C-SPAN is still inaccessible with a part-time status. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-11; 98117
Explains their cable company does not offer C-SPAN2 and asks Brian Lamb for assistance in having accessing to both C-SPAN T.V. networks. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-13; 06484
Protests the replacement of C-SPAN with "non-English speaking channels" and the "sexual deviants on MTV." -
Letter to C-SPAN ; 46131
Asks why the C-SPAN program schedule was removed from the Franklin, IN. TV program. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-30; 04096
Discusses a C-SPAN program about the law passed concerning cable television and praises one of the guests and refers to the other as a "windbag." -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-09; 07470
Shares a favorable opinion concerning a discussion about the FCC"s "Must Carry" and shares their opinion on the guests. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-10-05; 74114
States their cable company has stopped airing C-SPAN2 and asks about solving the issue. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-10-07; 75063
Requests their cable company continuing providing C-SPAN. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-03; 90024
Complains to their cable company about not receiving C-SPAN2. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-16; 92805
Believes there is a "news blackout" because of the occurrence of C-SPAN's airing restrictions coinciding with the upcoming NAFTA discussions. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-07; 90048
Asks for help in receiving C-SPAN2 with their cable company. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-07; 46036
Accuses their cable company of lying about the government forcing the removal of C-SPAN. Attached is an article about bypassing the censorship of C-SPAN. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-02; 08903
Asks for suggestions on a courses of action because their cable company has restricted C-SPAN's airtime. Attached is a letter to a mayor asking for assistance in protesting cable companies. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-03; 37205
Explains how their cable station removed C-SPAN for religious programming and inquires if C-SPAN can protest cable companies. -
Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 19103
Inquires if C-SPAN has discussed issues with sharing channels and asks how viewers can help. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-29; 94585
States their cable company does not provide C-SPAN2 and suggests Charles Lewis' "The Trading Game" for Booknotes. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-13; 06484
Protests the replacement of C-SPAN with "non-English speaking channels" and the "sexual deviants on MTV." -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-07; 08820
Explains they are a fan of C-SPAN and that the network has been moved to limited airing with their cable company. States the FCC is leading to a totalitarian state. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-03; 94080
Suggests C-SPAN renew their contract with their cable company or else the network will have limited show-times. -
Letter to C-SPAN, 1993-09-07; 95616
Explains how their cable company has removed C-SPAN2 and inquires about solving the issue.