Items

• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-15; 10952

  Accuses C-SPAN of bias and expresses frustration with the "liberal media."
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 55426

  Accuses Brian Lamb of sullied the word "fairness" by dividing their phone lines.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22; 29575

  Calls the new divided phone line system "affirmative action" and expresses disapproval of it.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-20; 28791

  Believes that the new divided phone line system undermines C-SPAN's credibilility and suggests they reconsider it.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 28428

  Calls the new divided phone line system "affirmative action" and expresses disapproval of it.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 02852

  Feels that the divided phone line policy is a disservice to democracy and free expression.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22

  Feels the new divided phone lines is "blah" and has hurt C-SPAN's balance.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 85205

  Feels that C-SPAN "gave in" to Clinton supporters by dividing the phone lines and questions why more conservative journalists do not appear on Washington Journal.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 80907

  Accuses C-SPAN of being unfair by dividing the phone calls and believes they are Bias.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 19442

  Gives their reasoning for disliking the divided phone line system and criticizes liberals.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16

  Urges Brian Lamb to approach the problems with the open call system differently.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 30328

  Praises C-SPAN but dislikes the divided phone line system and hopes they will return to an open call format.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 42025

  Believes the divided phone line system is a blatant distortion of media coverage disguised as fairness.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 28731

  Believes the open call system was fair but the divided phone lines give a false impression of parity and suggests they rethink the format.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 70814

  Praises Brian Lamb, Susan Swain, and C-SPAN, but expresses their disappointment in changing the open call system, particularly in support of Bill Clinton.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-19; 28803

  Feels that the division of phone calls has made Washington Journal more boring.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-19

  Urges C-SPAN to not be "taken over by the Clinton administration"
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22

  Believes the divided phone lines are unfair and questions why liberal talk show hosts have failed while other conservative hosts have thrived.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-20; 98277

  Questions the fairness of dividing the phone lines by party.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.

  Asks why C-SPAN has not had the divided phone lines recently and thinks they gave in to right wing Republicans.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-20; 73108

  Believes there are more conservative people in the country and that C-SPAN's divided phone lines does not demonstrate that.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05; 16002

  Urges C-SPAN to reconsider balancing the call-ins.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-17; 34471

  States disappointment in C-SPAN for dividing the phone lines because they feel it is an effort to be "politically correct."
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22; 93906

  Hopes that C-SPAN will discontinue its separate phone lines because they believe Democrats are using all three phone lines.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22; 18425

  Believes the majority of the population is conservative and that the divided phone lines is an effort to be "politically correct."
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-15; 93906

  Accuses C-SPAN of bias for "filtering" calls and states their feeling that this is n ot fairness.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-16; 90621

  Expresses disappointment with the division of the phone lines by political party.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-01; 29834

  Believes the divided phone lines demonstrate C-SPAN's bias, criticizes liberals and Bill Clinton, and states their dislike of major news networks.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-24; 24073

  Expresses feeling that the divided phone lines indicates that C-SPAN has become more liberal.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-25

  Believes the division of the phone lines takes away from C-SPAN's balance.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-20; 72712

  Expresses dislike of the new call-in system divided by party and encloses an opinion piece also complaining about the change.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-22; 39206

  Expresses their hope that C-SPAN will discontinue the use of different phone lines for political parties because they think it skews perception of popularity.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-19; 47670

  Thinks the division of the phone lines by political party have eliminated spontaneity in the call-ins.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-17; 12835

  Thanks them for C-SPAN, but states they are turning off the channel when the separate phone lines are used.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-06-24; 04736

  Accuses C-SPAN of censorship for dividing their phone calls and allegedly screening calls.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-06-24

  Praises the decision to divide phone lines by political party and praies a particular guest, then discusses their feelings on Whitewater and other recent news.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1991-07-06; 61615

  Compares the division of the phone lines by political party to baseball to demonstrate their lack of support for it.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-06-24; 97305

  Questions the division of the phone lines by political party and believes C-SPAN is bowing to pressure from liberal "friends."
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-06-27

  Believes public polls are biased and so is the call-in distribution.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 01036

  Recounts an effort to call in and concerns that C-SPAN ignored the anti-Clinton calls.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-01; 49068

  Feels the new divided phone lines "stacks" the balance of calls in favor of Clinton.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05; 76107

  Reports that they will continue trying to call in on the liberal phone line, despite being conservative, and desires more conservative journalists to be on Washington Journal.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05

  Believes that the moderate political sentiments of the country are not reflected in the viewer call-ins.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05; 64112

  Accuses Brian Lamb of being biased toward liberals and cutting off conservative callers, then discusses their feelings on media bias generally.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05; 29920

  Wonders when third-parties will be included in call-in lines and believes C-SPAN is contributing to polarization.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-01

  Dislikes C-SPAN's decision to divide phone lines on call-in shows because they feel it caters to the "malcontents," then asks why there is not more diversity in panelists.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-07; 86406

  Asks C-SPAN to stop dividing their phone calls because they feel it is the only time conservative views can be heard.
• Letter to C-SPAN, n.d.; 32250

  Expresses support for C-SPAN's decision to divide the phone lines.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-05; 02637

  Expresses dismay that C-SPAN has divided their phone lines and urges them to return to the original format.
• Letter to C-SPAN, 1996-07-06

  Expresses disappointment in the splitting of the phone lines and expresses negative opinions about liberals.